I love all kinds of books! For all my friends, I am known on GR as Alicja. I don't stick with a genre, that's boring. Instead you'll get reviews from the most random assortment of fiction and non-fiction works. It's probably due to my interests being as eclectic as my book tastes.
I'm a girlfriend-loving bisexual, science fiction geek, PC gamer, historical fiction devourer, hiker, atheist, history buff, opera lover, vegetarian, kayaker, metal and hard rock concert goer, science nerd, politics debater, world traveler, M/M romance fan, and I have the ability to transform from an adult-like hard-working professional into a screaming fangirl in five seconds flat.
Summary: Helen, Viv, Duncan, and Kay survive through the horrors of London torn apart by World War II as their lives connect and diverge. (You’d think there was more to the plot but no, not really).
Review: Overall, I enjoyed this book. It was built with an interesting structure where the first part occurred in 1947 (this part was slow and a bit tedious to read), the second in 1944, and the third in 1941 (wish we’d spent more time here, it was only about 40 pages long). The structure worked for this novel, and even though we knew the future I guessed some of the ending-beginnings (uhh) but not all (and was even very much surprised by one of them). I think the structure also contributed to the overall gloomy mood of the novel as we knew that the end of the war didn’t mean a happily ever after for the characters (but I guess that’s life, right?).
In general, the problem (or strength) with character driven novels is that it requires the readers to connect or empathize with the characters (or at least not be annoyed or frustrated by them). I felt differently about each character which gave this novel an edge over Waters’ Tipping the Velvet where Nancy just completely annoyed me right from the start.
I didn’t like Helen at all; she is one of those girls who can never be happy and when things are going well make up their own drama to fill the void. In that respect she is very similar to Nancy from Tipping the Velvet, and if it wasn’t for the other characters I would have abandoned reading this book.
At the same time, I was conflicted about Viv. I did like her; she was most interesting in 1944 where she faced with difficult challenges but it frustrated me to watch her go through so much knowing that everything that happens (knowing this because of the peek into 1947) elicited no change or growth on her part.
My favorite part of the plot was the mystery surrounding Duncan; it kept me wanting to turn the page. We find out early on in 1947 that he spent time in jail. I made various guesses about why he ended up there and was still completely shocked at just how wrong I was. I was also entirely in tears reading Duncan’s 1941 part of the story.
Lastly, I loved Kay. She was strong, assertive, kind, heroic, and loving but not without faults (which I found even more endearing). She didn’t seem interesting in 1947 but as more of her story was exposed, the more I understood her and how she ended up emotionally in that place, the more I connected with her. I think her character development was done brilliantly and every moment back into the past was like peeling back another one of her layers.
The descriptions were amazing and vivid and lyrical, making the different era come alive. Instead of presenting a romanticized view of the war, she described the horror and violence superbly. I just wish that when developing characters, Waters would write more Kays and less Nancies/Helens.